Skip to content

Emission factors explained in 3 minutes

Emission factors are a key element in accurately calculating your company’s GHG emissions. Here’s a quick run through of what you need to know about EFs and how they’re used to define, report and reduce your climate impact.
Emission factors explained in 3 minutess

What are emission factors?

Simply put, emission factors (EFs) are representative values that quantify the climate impact of products and processes. They are therefore key components for carbon accounting in calculating and tracking greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of an organization’s activities. 

An EF describes the rate at which a given activity releases GHGs into the atmosphere. In practice, it is a factor that is multiplied with activity data (e.g. kWh or liters) to calculate the climate impact of an activity, such as electricity consumption or combustion from a vehicle.

Why are emission factors important?

Emission factors are crucial for companies as they provide a standardized way to calculate and report the amount of GHGs produced from various activities. This enables companies to accurately assess their climate impact, comply with regulations, set reduction targets, and communicate their sustainability efforts to stakeholders, ultimately enhancing their environmental responsibility and corporate reputation.

Carbon dioxide equivalents and global warming potential

Emission factors are commonly described by the unit CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalents), making the data comparable across a range of harmful GHGs, and not only CO2. The unit is generally measured in metric tonnes and includes both the impact and the relative global warming potential (GWP) of all GHGs.

This warming potential of a greenhouse gas is defined by a value index of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), indicating the potency and global warming effect of a gas over a set period of time, most commonly calculated over 100 years (GWP100). Carbon dioxide (CO2) is used as a reference point of 1 GWP, where for instance methane (CH4) has a GWP value of 28, meaning that 1 tonne of methane has the same warming effect as 28 tonnes of CO2.

“Reliable carbon accounting requires a standardized approach that vets all aspects contributing to the final data.”

Amélie Huart – Senior Director, Position Green

How are EFs used to calculate emissions?

While EFs are an integral part of calculating the climate impact of a product or process, they must be used in combination with data provided by the reporting company, specifying the energy usage, distance travelled, fuel consumption or other relevant data relating to that activity. Multiplying this activity data by the corresponding emission factor provides an estimate of the amount of CO2e released. For example, if your company used 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel, you multiply this by the diesel emission factor to get total emissions.

If activity data is unavailable, spend-based data and emission factors are used. In this case, you use the financial expenditure on activities (e.g., money spent on transportation) and apply an emission factor that correlates spending with emissions. While this method is a common starting point – especially for Scope 3 calculations where data is generally more difficult to collect – it is significantly less accurate due to price fluctuations, discounts, and other financial factors that do not directly correspond with the actual quantity of emissions produced. This indirect relationship introduces greater uncertainty and potential inaccuracies in the emission estimates.

Where can emission factors be found?

Open-source databases provided by bodies such as the IPCC or governmental agencies like DEFRA or EPA are common sources used to access EFs. There are also licensed datasets of more complex emission factors, such as IEA or Ecoinvent. Databases can be divided by industry or they can provide a broader range covering emission factors for a typical GHG reporting.

These databases also provide methodologies to outline how the emission factor has been calculated and what is included in the factor to determine its usage, i.e. either supporting a supplier-specific, average-data or spend-based method, and what lifecycle activities that are included in the factor. Databases are usually updated annually as the emission factors are subject to continuous change. For example, electricity factors change due to the amount of total production and the electricity mix (share of fossil vs renewables) during the year. 

Quality assurance is a must

Reliable carbon accounting requires a standardized approach that vets all aspects contributing to the final data. Position Green’s team of experts monitors the emission factor sources for annual updates, reviewing the attached methodology for any major changes. The data is then mapped and harmonized to align with Position Green’s defined emission factor library structure. Following quality assurance testing, sensitivity analysis and the documenting of key changes to maintain a clear audit trail, the EFs are then implemented in the customer’s carbon accounting software setup.

Want to see smart carbon accounting in action?

Position Green can help you measure, report and reduce GHG emissions across all scopes and build your climate strategies on rock-solid data.

Contact us, and one of our experts will be in touch to schedule a demo of how our software solution works in practice. No strings attached, of course.

amélie huart

Amélie Huart

Senior Director

Position Green

Stay up to date with the latest ESG-trends with our newsletter

More insights

Articles

Ready to grow your sustainability team? Here’s how…

Articles

How CFOs can leverage CSRD for financial competitiveness – Findings from the ESG100

Articles

Understanding CSRD assurance costs and compliance timelines